Trade openness, governance and industrial productivity in West African Economic and Monetary Union(WAEMU) countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18559/rielf.2026.1.4355Keywords:
industrial development, trade openness, panel data, pooled-mean group methodAbstract
Purpose: Inward-looking development strategies can lead to marginalization and slow growth especially for the small African domestic markets. However, when weak economies try to participate in the global economy studies in Southeast Asia show they end with significant challenges. Therefore, this paper analyzed the effects of trade openness and governance on industrial development in West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) countries.
Methodology: However, due to data availability, the study covered seven countries over the 1996 – 2018 period. The pooled-mean group method was used in the analysis.
Findings: The results of the analysis showed that, in the long run, trade openness did not benefit the development of the industrial sector in all the countries studied. However, in the short run, the results revealed the specificities of eachcountry. These short-run results showed that trade openness has a positive and significant effect on the industry added values observed in countries such as Burkina Faso, Niger and Togo. The results also showed that government inefficiency has a negative impact on the development of the industrial sector in the long -run for all the countries studied.
Originality: Furthermore, the indicator capturing the degree of freedom of corruption had a positive impact on the development of the industrial sector in the short or long run. Therefore, active engagement with the forces of globalization need strategic approaches in their integration in developing countries.
JEL Classification
Trade and Environment (F18)
Government Expenditures and Education (H52)
Industrial Organization and Macroeconomics: Industrial Structure and Structural Change • Industrial Price Indices (L16)
Africa (O55)
Downloads
References
Alderson, A. (1999). Explaining deindustrialization: Globalization, failure, or success? American Sociological Review, 64(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657372
View in Google Scholar
Aryeetey, E., Court, J., Nissanke, M., & Weder, B. (1998). Strengthening Africa’s parhticipation in the global economy. United Nations University & African Economic Research Consortium. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4082991?v=pdf
View in Google Scholar
Banque mondiale. (2019). Base de données des indicateurs de développement dans le monde. https://donnees.banquemondiale.org
View in Google Scholar
BCEAO (Banque Centrale des États de l’Afrique de l’Ouest). (2019). The WAEMU Surveillance framework: reforms to foster public debt sustainability. IMF Country Report, 19/91.
View in Google Scholar
Brechet, J. P., Desmarteau, R. H., & Saives, A. (2016). La gouvernance dans les industries fondées sur la science: Le cas des biotechnologies du Québec. Document de Travail, 2009/21. https://hal.science/hal-00422435v1
View in Google Scholar
Chatri, A. Zouiri, H. Zenati, A., & Chouati, M. (2019). Ouverture commerciale et développement du secteur industriel dans les pays en development: Cas de l’Afrique subsaharienne. In A. Chatri (Ed.), Ouverture, productivité et croissance économique au Maroc (pp. 167–182). Laboratoire d’Économie Appliquée & Policy Center for the New South. https://www.labeamse.com/2019/04/OPCM10.html
View in Google Scholar
Chichilnisky, G. (1994). North-south trade and the global environment. American Economic Review, 84(4), 851–874.
View in Google Scholar
Clark, C. (1957). The conditions of economic progress. Macmillan Press.
View in Google Scholar
CNUCED. (2017). La rapport sur le commerce et le développement 2017. Nations Unies.
View in Google Scholar
Crespi, G., & Geuna, A. (2005). Modelling and measuring scientific production: Results for a panel of OECD countries. SPRU Working Paper Series 133.
View in Google Scholar
Crespi, G., & Geuna, A. (2008). An empirical study of scientific production: A cross country analysis, 1981–2002. Research Policy, 37(4), 565–579.
View in Google Scholar
Dijkstra, A. G. (2000). Trade liberalization and industrial development in Latin America. World Development, 28(9), 1567–1582. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00040-1
View in Google Scholar
Dutraive, V. (2016). Introduction. Industrie, finance, innovation et gouvernance dans la crise: Vers un changement structurel?
View in Google Scholar
Fjose, S., Grünfeld, L., & Green, C. (2010). SMEs and growth in sub-Saharan Africa— identifying SME roles and obstacles to SME growth. MENON Business Economics, 14.
View in Google Scholar
Heckscher, E., & Ohlin, B. (1933). International and inter-regional trade. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
View in Google Scholar
Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. MIT Press. Retrieved from https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/market-structure-and-foreign-trade
View in Google Scholar
Hurlin, C., & Mignon, V. (2007). Second generation panel unit roots tests. Orleans Economics Laboratory, Center for Prospective Studies and International Information, Economix. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00159842v1
View in Google Scholar
Jalilian, H. & Weiss, J. (1999). De-industrialisation in sub-Saharan Africa: Myth or crisis? Journal of African Economics, 9(1), 24–43.
View in Google Scholar
Kao, C. (1999). Cointegration tests applied to panel data cited by Anindya Banerjee in panel data unit roots and cointegration: An overview. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(1), 607–629.
View in Google Scholar
Kapri, K. (2016). Productivity, firm size and trade liberalization in a partner country: Evidence from Korean firm-level data. International Review of Economics & Finance, 45, 572–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.01.010
View in Google Scholar
Kim, E. (2000). Trade liberalization and productivity growth in Korean manufacturing industries: Price protection, market power, and scale efficiency. Journal of Development Economics, 62(1), 55–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00075-4
View in Google Scholar
Kone, A. S., Singare, H. B. & Diallo, S. S. (2023). Gouvernance et industrialisation du Mali. Revue Internationale de la Recherche Scientifique, 1(1), 42–60. https://www.revue-irs.com/index.php/home/article/view/8
View in Google Scholar
Kos à Mougnol, A., & Kamajou, F. (2016). Determinants du développement financier dans les pays de la zone Franc Cfa: Le role de la qualite des institution. European Scientific Journal, 12(28), 285. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n28p285
View in Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (1979). A model of innovation, technology transfer, and the world distribution of income. Journal of Political Economy, 87(2), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1086/260755
View in Google Scholar
Levin, A, & Lin, C. F. (1992). Unit root test in panel data: Asymptotic and finite sample properties. University of California.
View in Google Scholar
Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
View in Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 631–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631
View in Google Scholar
Miyagiwa, K., & Ohno, Y. (1995). Closing the technology gap under protection. American Economic Review, 85(4), 755–770.
View in Google Scholar
Myint, H. (1997). Adam Smith’s theory of international trade in the perspective of economic development. Economica, 44(175), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.2307/2553648
View in Google Scholar
Ngoa, T. H. & Atangana, O. H. (2013, octobre). L’incidence du commerce Nord-Sud et du commerce Sud-Sud sur l’industrialisation en Afrique. Conférence économique africaine, Intégration régionale en Afrique, Banque Africaine de Développement. Johannesburg. Afrique du Sud.
View in Google Scholar
N’Guessan, K. R. (2019). Measuring the degree of international financial integration of ECOWAS countries: An analysis of the paradox of Feldstein et Horioka (1980). International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 26(1), 1–11.
View in Google Scholar
Njikam, O. (2009). Trade liberalization, infrastructure and industrial performance in Cameroon. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ousmanou-Njikam/publication/228419267_Trade_Liberalization_Infrastructure_and_Industrial_Performance_in_Cameroon/links/545238550cf24884d887a1da/Trade-Liberalization-Infrastructure-and-Industrial-Performance-in-Cameroon.pdf
View in Google Scholar
Pedroni, P. (1995). Panel cointegration. Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Working Paper in Economics, 92-013. https://web.williams.edu/Economics/pedroni/WP-95-13.pdf
View in Google Scholar
Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogenous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics (special issue), 61, 653–670.
View in Google Scholar
Pedroni, P. (2001). Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(4), 727–731.
View in Google Scholar
Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Department of Economics Working Papers, 2004-15.
View in Google Scholar
Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
View in Google Scholar
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474156
View in Google Scholar
Rodriguez, F., & Rodrik, D. (2000). Trade policy and economic growth: A skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 15, 261–338.
View in Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (1992). Closing the technology gap: Does trade liberalization really help? NBER Working Paper, 2654. http://www.nber.org/papers/w2654.pdf
View in Google Scholar
Rowthorn, R., & Coutts, K. (2004). De-industrialisation and the balance of payments in advanced economies. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(5), 767–790. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beh034
View in Google Scholar
Tahir, M., Ruiz, E. M., Khan, I., & Afridi, M. A. (2016). The role of trade openness for industrial sector development: Panel data evidence from SAARC region. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 10(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-01-2015-0007
View in Google Scholar
Topalova, P., & Khandelwal, A. (2011). Trade liberalization and firm productivity: The case of India. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(3), 995–1009. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00095
View in Google Scholar
Ukwandu, D. (2015). David Ricardo’s theory of comparative advantage and its implication for development in sub-Saharan Africa: A decolonial view. African Journal of Public Affairs, 8(3), 17–34. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/58163
View in Google Scholar
Westerlund, J., & Edgerton, D. L. (2007). A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Economics Letters, 97(3), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.03.003
View in Google Scholar
Wood, A. (1994). North-south trade, employment and inequality: Changing fortunes in a skill-driven world. Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kossi Ayenagbo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
